kicker According to reports, at its next general meeting on March 3, the DFL will vote on a clear series of new penalties for clubs that violate Bundesliga financial regulations. The league body that governs Germany’s top professional football league wants to impose stricter infractions on clubs that spend too much of their budget on players. GGFN is pleased to provide a summary of:
Is this a vote on the salary cap?
No. This is a clearer and separate issue and should not be confused with attempts by DFL member clubs to tighten existing regulation. In fact, the operations of the Bundesliga and Bundesliga clubs are already under strict scrutiny to prevent overspending. The 36 clubs under the DFL are regularly “stress tested” to ensure long-term financial solvency and must maintain healthy liquidity to ensure there are no unexpected club insolvencies.
advertise
The new rules will force clubs to adhere to a limit that allows them to spend no more than 70% of their sports-related budgets on “player licensing”. This includes wages as well as various expenses related to transfers, loans, resales etc. German clubs already have to comply with FIFA and UEFA’s Financial Fair Play rules, which try to limit such spending, but the new rules tighten the differences and set clear boundaries.
Will new regulations limit Bundesliga wages?
In the long run, there is potential. kicker On average, Bundesliga and Bundesliga clubs spend around 55% of their sports budgets on player licensing, the report said. Despite this, there are still kicker It is said that in any given season there are two to three clubs whose operating rates are dangerously close to the 70% limit. Regardless, the 36 DFL members will have until the 2027/28 season to adjust to the partial implementation of the new rules. Comprehensive monetary sanctions will not be implemented until the 2028/29 season.
Will the new regulations limit private investment in clubs?
Unfortunately, the new rules don’t seem to be interested in this issue at all. this kicker The article specifically mentions two major private investment fiascos (Hertha Berlin and Schalke) that ultimately led to the collapse of both clubs within the current decade. However, kicker It is also claimed that major cash injections such as the €80 million that club patron Dietmar Hopp is expected to inject into Hoffenheim in the autumn of 2024 will not count towards the “70% calculation”.
advertise
Additionally, non-50+1 clubs such as RB Leipzig, Bayer Leverkusen 04 and Wolfsburg are officially exempt from the additional capital their parent companies wish to add to the club’s sporting budget. From this perspective, the additional private money Lars Windhorst invested in Hertha Berlin simply does not apply to the new “70% calculation”. What’s a little confusing is kicker When this new rule failed to prevent a repeat of the past, the Windhorst case was cited.
It is understandable that the working group responsible for submitting proposals to the DFL took advantage of such a loophole. Wolfsburg, Leverkusen, and Leipzig are all represented on it. The proposal does promise a “fair review” of private capital infusions, but it’s unclear how such a review would differ from other regulatory guardrails already in place.
What is GGFN’s analysis and opinion?
The new rules are still a rather bland technocratic implementation and are likely to interest few people. It’s easy to see some positive intentions and, going forward, the DFL wants to ensure some tough penalties prevent clubs from spending too much on players. From a more cynical perspective, one could claim this is a means of delaying the entire “salary cap” debate in the future. German football could invoke this provision to bypass the debate entirely. In the meantime, the very expensive accounting lawyers have plenty of time to figure out how to outwit it.
advertise
It should be noted that the “salary cap” debate is not really a hot-button issue in German football. The fan base remains passionate about 50+1 and preventing foreign money from penetrating its football clubs through privately funded clubs, sponsorship and investment deals. Linking Bayern’s dominance to a “salary cap” doesn’t even make complete sense, as Bayern does face budget constraints, has been very frugal this year, and is still dominating the league.
Fans will be further satisfied after the DFL resolved the issue of a fairer distribution of television revenue during negotiations for the 2020/21 and 2025/26 seasons. Although in both cases the more equitable distribution was largely trivial, the public was largely satisfied by the fact that the scale became more progressive. Indeed, league-wide fan protests in the spring of 2024 also led to the collapse of a proposed DFL investor deal, which maintained a fragile peace over financing issues despite fans There are still weekly protests against staggered kick-off times for television viewers.
What fans of German football should like about this new rule is that, if applied correctly, it should incentivize clubs to invest more of their sports budgets in homegrown projects such as academies, training grounds, facilities and youth programmes. Furthermore, the new rules are reportedly structured well enough to target repeat offenders with appropriate financial sanctions, points deductions and transfer bans. Sometimes technocracies can build something quite sophisticated to meet legal needs.
So, of course, we have another question Exceptions.
advertise
sigh. These are still self-explanatory, aren’t they?
Player licenses are capped at 70% for all clubs…
… Unless they have a wealthy donor, or a multi-billion dollar conglomerate providing funding.
*cough*
GGFN | Peter Weiss
