I’m giving my son $250K and my daughter 50% of a rental we co-own. Is that fair?

“My son has no financial investment in the property.” (The subject of the photo is the model.) – Getty Images/iStockphoto

Instead of giving my son a portion of some rental property that my daughter and I own 50/50, I promised him $250,000 as an inheritance before I died. The reason is simple: my son has no financial investment in the property;

I am now saving this money for him. When the amount accrues to $250,000 (including interest), should I give him the money, or should he have $250,000, plus the interest paid? Obviously, I prefer the former scenario.

I try desperately to do the right thing for everyone. How to Make Up Home Equity?

Mother

Related: My father gave me $250,000 to buy a house but told me not to tell my two siblings. Am I morally obligated to tell them?

.

You are a generous parent, not a Federal Reserve board member or a Nobel Prize-winning economist; and certainly not a fortune teller.
You are a generous parent, not a Federal Reserve board member or a Nobel Prize-winning economist; and certainly not a fortune teller. – MarketWatch Illustration

It may never be completely equal. Whatever you decide, write it down.

Your daughter invested in a house and, as you said, she brought in some of her own money. Given the long-term trajectory of the real estate market, the value of the home will increase. Your son has the opportunity to invest the $250,000 in the stock market or perhaps use it as seed capital to purchase his own property.

If you want to ensure that each child receives the exact same inheritance, down to the last penny, you could give him a monetary equivalent of your share of the rental property and allow your daughter to own the home outright. If you can afford to give your son the equivalent in cash, it would be a strange approach to force your daughter to become a joint landlord with her brother against her will and/or without her knowledge.

See also  Aaron Judge and a loaded US roster hope to dethrone Ohtani's Japan at the World Baseball Classic

The clue is in your question: if the agreement is “I will give you $250,000…” then you really should give him $250,000 with no additional interest. Interest is just one way you can accumulate the amount of money you commit. You are not operating as a bank and he is not entitled to any interest unless you promise him interest. Ultimately, you want to ensure that each of them receives a similar gift and/or legacy.

Imagine that you made this real estate deal in 2009 and gifted your son $250,000. He’d be acting like a bandit, given the drop in real estate prices, which took a decade to recover. You are a generous parent, not a Federal Reserve board member or a Nobel Prize-winning economist, and certainly not a fortune teller. Sometimes, a non-cash inheritance leaves a lot to chance.

Spread the love

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *