Gorsuch says ideological divides on Supreme Court come down to ‘how you read law,’ not politics

Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch said disagreements among colleagues on the high court are often less about politics than differences in approaches to constitutional interpretation — a dynamic he said affects the court’s rulings and its internal relationships.

“This has nothing to do with politics,” Gorsuch told Fox News Digital in a recent interview. “This must be done [with] How do you read the law. Explain methodology. “

Gorsuch, nominated by the President Donald Trump In 2017, he described himself as a “textualist,” noting that his approach focuses on interpreting legal texts based on the ordinary meaning of the written words. this philosophy Related to originalism – or the view that the Constitution should be interpreted based on its original public meaning at the time of its adoption.

Other judges have had different interpretations, including ones that allow for evolution over time. Gorsuch emphasized that the differences, while significant, are not inherently personal.

In rare public address, Justice Thomas warns of progressivism’s threat to America

Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch speaks at the Reagan Library in Simi Valley, California, on May 5, 2026.

(Getty Images)

“At the end of the day, you’re trying to get the right answer based on the law,” he said, adding that disagreements are an expected and healthy part of the process.

Read it on the Fox News app

His comments come as members of the federal judiciary and the Supreme Court have come under increasing scrutiny in recent years, including from Trump and his allies who have criticized the court for encroaching on what they see as the responsibilities of the executive branch.

Trump criticized on “Truth Social” last month Supreme CourtThe conservative majority considered him “grossly disloyal” in blocking so-called “Emancipation Day” tariffs in February.

He also suggested they might block his executive order seeking to end so-called birthright citizenship in the United States

“Certain ‘Republican’ justices have become weak, stupid and terrible, completely contrary to what they are ‘supposed’ to stand for,” Trump said.

Justice Gorsuch highlights humanity, history in children’s book celebrating America’s 250th anniversary

U.S. President Donald Trump greets Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. at the U.S. Capitol

President Donald Trump greets Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts as he arrives to address a 2025 joint session of Congress.

He contrasted that with the court’s liberal judges, who Trump said “hold together like glue and are completely committed to the people and the ideology that got them there.”

Gorsuch emphasized that justices often have a lot in common even if their interpretations of the Constitution lead them to different conclusions.

He suggested that this approach also applies to how judges work together behind closed doors – collaboration and debate being at the heart of the High Court’s constitutional duties.

Federal judge blocks Trump’s birthright citizenship ban for all babies, testing lower courts’ power

The United States Supreme Court building in Washington, D.C., seen from the outside

On November 13, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court building in Washington, D.C., unveiled new ethics guidelines following a scandal involving gifts and vacations received by some justices.

“The framers understood that people would come to the table with different perspectives,” Gorsuch told Fox News Digital. “The goal was to reason together.”

While ideological differences may be sharp, Gorsuch emphasized that the high court’s culture is based on mutual respect.

Click here to download the Fox News app

“If you sit down and listen to someone long enough, you’re going to find something you can agree on,” he added. “Maybe you start here.”

Original source of the article: Gorsuch says Supreme Court’s ideological divide comes down to ‘how you interpret the law’ rather than politics

Spread the love
See also  He Said “Do What’s Right”—But This Is What It Looked Like

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *