Recently, the Ethereum network has received a lot of criticism about the data transmission cost and scalability of the protocol. In a blog post titled “Endgame” published on December 6, Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin discussed plans to improve expansion, the upcoming transition to proof of stake, and review resistance.

Buterin outlines a reasonable Ethereum expansion roadmap in an Endgame blog post

Vitalik Buterin, the well-known co-founder of the Ethereum project, outlined his thoughts on a “reasonable roadmap” that can solve the network expansion problem. This blog post titled “Endgame” explains some concepts, such as “second-layer mortgage with low resource requirements”, and introduces fraud proofs or Zk-Snarks, allowing ETH users to obtain block validity “cheaply”. The roadmap summarized by Buterin aims to improve the blockchain without giving up censorship resistance.

“After doing all this, what do we get? Buterin raised this question in his latest blog post. “We got a chain where block production is centralized, but block verification is trustless and highly decentralized. And special anti-censorship magic can prevent block producers from censoring. Buterin further added:

This is aesthetically ugly, but it does provide the basic guarantee we are looking for: even if every major stakeholder (block producer) intends to attack or censor, the worst thing they can do is to completely download Line, at this the chain stops accepting transactions until the community pools their resources and establishes an honest main stakeholder node.

Buterin discussed the Ethereum Rollup-centric roadmap, big blockchain, and cross-domain MEV

Buterin’s recent blog post was a discussion at the end of November when Ethereum developers discussed concepts such as EIP-4488.The plan can reduce the cost of data transmission Five times less, And Ethereum developer Tim Beiko shared His thoughts on EIP-4488 and reducing aggregate costs. In the Endgame blog post, Buterin also talked about the “possible long-term future” of using aggregation and this technology.

See also  Ethereum Software Firm Consensys Collects User Data, Privacy Policy Revealed – Privacy Bitcoin News

“Despite the inherent uncertainty, Ethereum is very suitable for adapting to this future world,” Buterin emphasized. “The far-reaching benefit of the Ethereum-centric roadmap is that it means that Ethereum is open to all futures, and there is no need to comment on which one will win.” Buterin further added:

Ethereum researchers should seriously consider the degree of decentralization that can be achieved in block production. If a cross-domain MEV (even from an aggregated cross-shard MEV occupies multiple shards) makes it unsustainable, then adding complex pipelines to simplify highly distributed block production may not be worth it.

As far as “big blockchains” are concerned, Buterin said, “They have a way to become trustless and anti-censorship. We will soon discover whether their core developers and communities really value anti-censorship and anti-censorship. Centralization, let them do it.” Buterin’s blog post concluded: “It may take years to achieve.”

“Sharding and data availability sampling are very complicated techniques to implement. Buterin’s Endgame post concludes that people need years of improvement and auditing to be able to safely store their assets in a ZK-rollup running a full EVM.” And Cross-domain MEV research is in its infancy. However, the real but bright future of the scalable blockchain may appear, which seems to be becoming clearer. “

Tags in this story

calldata, developer, EIP-4488, ETH, Ether, Ethereum fee, Ethereum (ETH), Ethereum blockchain, fee reduction, Gas, gas fee, L1, L1 fee, L2, L2 fee, optimism , Trimming, cost reduction, summary transaction, summary, zoom, technology, Tim Beiko, Vitalik Buterin, Zksync

What do you think of Vitalik Buterin’s Engame blog post about expansion and possible roadmaps? Please tell us your thoughts on this topic in the comments section below.

Image Source: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wikimedia Commons

Disclaimer: This article is for reference only. It is not a direct offer or invitation to buy or sell, nor is it a recommendation or endorsement of any product, service or company. does not provide investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. The company or the author is not directly or indirectly responsible for any damage or loss caused or claimed to be caused by using or relying on any content, goods or services mentioned in this article.