Constitutional law professor says Trump ’s executive orders related to social media sites have little legal effect
After a fact check on Twitter, President Trump took rampage against social media companies
Trump often claims that social media sites are biased toward Democrats, which is his argument for attacking Google search in 2018. Trump also made the same charges against Twitter and Facebook. The president may harm his chances of reelection because the Trump campaign is heavily publicized on Facebook, and the president often uses Twitter to broadcast his policies, such as his desire to regulate social media.
Jack Balkin, a professor of constitutional law at Yale University, said: “The president is trying to scare, intimidate, intimidate, and coax social media companies to keep him alone, not to do what Twitter just did to him. Things. The professor called it an executive order. “It is mainly smoke and mirrors,” and said that this has little legal impact. The executive order will require the FCC to supervise Article 230, which is the 1996 law (called Communication method. Trump ’s executive order will require the FCC to determine whether the social media company is using deceptive policies to review content and whether the company has not followed its own terms of service. According to reports, the FCC will be asked in an executive order to see whether social media companies’ editing of content should cause these companies to lose protection of Article 230.
Another part of the draft executive order requires the White House Office of Digital Strategy to release a tool that allows consumers to complain about social media sites that implement censorship (you can see the irony here, right?). Complaints will be sent to the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). The FTC will then investigate the complaint to see if the actions taken by the social media company violated the law. These complaints will be made public. In addition, the Attorney General will establish a working group composed of state attorneys general to review state laws to ensure that they prohibit online platforms from unfair and deceptive behavior.
As you might imagine, Twitter’s fact-checking of the president triggered a political fire. On FOX News yesterday, FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr announced on Twitter that the company had decided to “ engage with the President of the United States with its partisanship and political views. ”