Remember Apple's "Battery door"As early as 2017? If there are more upcoming news stories, such as Covid-19 And the US presidential election has brought the old iPhone controversy to mind. However, if you happen to have an iPhone 6, 7, or SE, and you updated those phones to a specific version of iOS software sometime before December 2017, Apple may owe you a settlement fee.
As part of a class action lawsuit, Apple has agreed to a preliminary $ 500 million settlement, which states that Apple has released software that intentionally slows down the iPhone's aging process. Although the settlement agreement is still subject to final approval, the proposed terms disclosed on Friday show that Apple may eventually pay iPhone users $ 25 for each affected device.
Apple hasn't shared information about where or how consumers can file claims, and according to a class action lawyer not involved in the case, it could take weeks. However, according to attorney Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, Jonathan Selbin, chairman of the company's practice group on economically damaging product defects, the proposed settlement appears to be fair.
"These situations are tricky, especially when your product is not working properly at all," Selbin said, noting that a completely malfunctioning product is easier to build. "It seems to me [to the plaintiff] a very good result."
An Apple spokesman declined to comment, instead directing Wired to court documents, in which Apple firmly denied allegations of misconduct. Reuters Earlier report Apple "settles cases nationwide to avoid the burden and expense of litigation."
Back in December 2017, Users on Reddit Began to propose the correlation between iPhone battery aging and iPhone performance degradation. Such as Geekbench states, The performance difference is unlikely to be a function of battery power alone, but due to the iOS upgrade from 10.2.0 to 10.2.1, the site concluded that "When the battery power dropped, Apple made changes to limit performance beyond Some point. "
Soon after, Apple Confirm customer suspicionAdmit that this has been slowing down the performance of older iPhones to compensate for the decline in battery quality. Many believe that Apple's failure was not due to its inability to change the physical limitations of lithium-ion batteries, but rather its decision to simply refuse to provide customers with information about performance-limiting software. Apple responded by developing a battery replacement plan for $ 29 per battery and giving iPhone owners the option to turn off "throttling" in future software updates. The company firmly believed that this performance management system was the correct way to solve the aging of the iPhone battery, so it later stated that it would Continue "throttling" practice You can also use the newer iPhone.
But the damage has been done-although Apple is not responsible for it-and Apple has suffered a series of class actions and Inquiries from the Justice Department and the Securities and Exchange Commission In 2017 and 2018. Consumers are frustrated that Apple's lack of transparency has led in many cases to people buying new phones rather than knowing that there are other options to improve the performance of their current devices. The Justice Department and the SEC are examining whether Apple violates securities laws.
There are now 66 class action complaints, 7 million pages of Apple materials, and a series of on-site mediations. Apple's lawyers and plaintiff's lawyers have reached a settlement.
What happened next
The proposed solution comes with some regulations. "Billing category" does not include all iPhone; it means all previous or current US owners of iPhone 6, 6 Plus, 6s Plus, 7, 7 Plus, and iPhone SE. If you are running iOS 10.2.1 or later, or if you are running iOS 11.2 or later [if you are using iPhone 7 or 7 Plus], these devices are especially suitable for these devices, provided that these versions of iOS are in Installed before December 21, 2017.