Americans now have much more money in IRAs than 401(k)s. Why that leaves workers more vulnerable.

- Getty Images
– Getty Images

The most remarkable development in America’s private sector retirement system is not the shift away from the old defined benefit plans that began around 1980 and are now almost complete.

Rather, it is a shift from 401(k) plans, which replaced defined benefit plans, to individual retirement accounts. Total IRA assets now exceed the amount of 401(k) plans by $7 trillion (see Figure 1).

-

The transition from a 401(k) to an IRA moves employee funds into a different regulatory environment. The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, which covers 401(k) plans, requires plan sponsors to operate as fiduciaries and act in the best interests of plan participants at all times.

By contrast, the standards of conduct for broker-dealers selling IRA investments are far less protective than ERISA’s fiduciary duties of loyalty and prudence, which courts have consistently described as “the highest standard known to the law.”

Additionally, in a 401(k) environment, there is greater emphasis on disclosing expenses in an easy-to-understand format than in an IRA. Most importantly, a 401(k) puts more emphasis than an IRA on keeping funds in the plan until retirement.

In fact, all withdrawals from 401(k) plans and traditional IRAs before an employee reaches age 59½ are subject to a 10% penalty (in addition to federal and state income taxes). Exceptions include distribution of large medical expenses, hardship caused by permanent and total disability, and periodic payments over a lifetime.

See also  Trail Cam Captures First Confirmed Sighting of Animal Since the 1800s: 'Tremendously Exciting'

However, IRAs allow withdrawals for three other reasons: to pay for higher education; up to $10,000 to purchase a new home; and, for those who have been unemployed for 12 weeks or more, to pay for health insurance.

In addition to being exempt from the 10% penalty tax, the barriers to accessing funds for an IRA are much lower than for a 401(k). Importantly, 401(k) withdrawals can only be made when changing jobs or for hardship reasons, whereas IRA withdrawals can be made at any time and without good reason.

Additionally, 401(k) hardship withdrawals involve interactions with plan administrators, filing of paperwork, and, at least in theory, justification for the withdrawal. The emotional and practical burden of this multi-stage process can hinder exit. In contrast, IRA providers generally discourage withdrawals before retirement age.

Finally, Congress in 1992 imposed a 20% withholding tax on withdrawals from 401(k)s, but no such withholding tax exists on IRA transactions.

The growing role of IRAs has made the retirement system far less efficient. Without a fiduciary to act as a buffer between participants and the market, investing would be suboptimal. As options for withdrawing money from accounts become more available, leakage will increase. Additionally, IRAs provide less protection than 401(k)s. They protect fewer assets in the event of bankruptcy or litigation and provide fewer guarantees to spouses: 401(k)s designate a spouse as the default beneficiary and require notarized consent to name others, while IRAs allow the owner to designate any beneficiary.

See also  Wife of passenger killed in fatal train crash says they’ve been ‘robbed’ of future together

Wise minds used to think the Employee Retirement Income Security Act was cool because it protected the benefits of workplace retirement plan participants. Even those who agree that its administrative burdens and costs could lead to the demise of defined benefit plans still praise its protective measures.

Shouldn’t we be concerned that only 45% of the private sector’s assets are protected by ERISA? What should we do?

Spread the love

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *